It's complicated. It depends on which BoE you ask.
There are disputes over ancient treaties that were intentionally written in a way that take advantage of ignorance. Disputes over the Empire's expansion practices and military presence.
Which are all valid; I'll give then that. But that's not what the real issue with Blood of Eden is. They believe that necromancers are abominations and need to die.
no subject
There are disputes over ancient treaties that were intentionally written in a way that take advantage of ignorance. Disputes over the Empire's expansion practices and military presence.
Which are all valid; I'll give then that. But that's not what the real issue with Blood of Eden is. They believe that necromancers are abominations and need to die.
Sound familiar?